COMPARISON OF SETAR AND LSTAR MODELS IN PREDICTING REGULAR CONVENTIONAL GASOLINE PRICE DATA

Authors

  • Anastasya A. M. Sidabalok Department of Mathematics, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia Author
  • Subian Saidi Department of Mathematics, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia Author
  • Bernadhita Herindri Samodera Utami Department of Mathematics, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia Author
  • Netti Herawati Department of Mathematics, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61778/ijmrast.v3i6.139

Keywords:

Time Series, Forecasting, SETAR, LSTAR, Gasoline Prices, Nonlinear Models

Abstract

Forecasting involves predicting what may happen in the future. An essential part of this process is examining time series data, especially when it shows nonlinear characteristics. This study concentrates on predicting the prices of standard regular gasoline in the United States, which consists of a time series affected by numerous economic and seasonal elements. It utilizes two nonlinear time series models: Self-Exciting Threshold Autoregressive (SETAR) and Logistic Smooth Transition Autoregressive (LSTAR). SETAR segments the data into distinct regimes based on a threshold variable, whereas LSTAR allows more gradual changes between regimes through a logistic function. Past research has indicated that both models effectively capture structural shifts in financial and economic time series. By assessing the forecasting performance of the SETAR and LSTAR models, this research seeks to identify which model better forecasts gasoline price fluctuations that demonstrate nonlinear behavior. The findings are anticipated to enhance understanding of energy market trends and aid in making better economic choices.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF SETAR AND LSTAR MODELS IN PREDICTING REGULAR CONVENTIONAL GASOLINE PRICE DATA. (2025). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Arts, Science and Technology, 3(6), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.61778/ijmrast.v3i6.139